Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Economic Scene - Real Choice? It’s Off-Limits in Health Bills - NYTimes.com

Economic Scene - Real Choice? It’s Off-Limits in Health Bills - NYTimes.com
Americans give lower marks to their health insurer than they do to their life insurer, their auto insurer or their bank, according to the American Customer Satisfaction Index. Even the Postal Service gets better marks. (Cable companies, however, get worse ones.) No wonder President Obama’s favorite villain is health insurers.


Who’s Driving Twitter’s Popularity? Not Teenagers - NYTimes.com

Who’s Driving Twitter’s Popularity? Not Teenagers - NYTimes.com
Many young people use the Web not to keep up with the issues of the day but to form and express their identities, said Andrea Forte, who studied how high school students use social media for her dissertation. (She will be an assistant professor at Drexel University in the spring.)

“Your identity on Twitter is more your ability to take an interesting conversational turn, throw an interesting bit of conversation out there. Your identity isn’t so much identified by the music you listen to and the quizzes you take,” as it is on Facebook, she said. She called Twitter “a comparatively adult kind of interaction.”


Monday, August 24, 2009

Just 53% Say Capitalism Better Than Socialism - Rasmussen Reports™

Just 53% Say Capitalism Better Than Socialism - Rasmussen Reports™
It is interesting to compare the new results to an earlier survey in which 70% of Americans prefer a free-market economy. The fact that a “free-market economy” attracts substantially more support than “capitalism” may suggest some skepticism about whether capitalism in the United States today relies on free markets.


Only 53% of American adults believe capitalism is better than socialism.

Just 53% Say Capitalism Better Than Socialism - Rasmussen Reports™
Only 53% of American adults believe capitalism is better than socialism.


Thursday, August 20, 2009

California Senate OKs plan to reduce prison population -- latimes.com

California Senate OKs plan to reduce prison population -- latimes.com
Democratic leaders and Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger have been pushing a proposal that could help satisfy the judges and save money to shore up California's shaky budget.

They would cut the prison population by 37,000 by the middle of 2011 with measures that would shift resources toward higher-risk inmates and parolees. They would reduce the time lower-level offenders and those who show evidence of rehabilitation would serve behind bars and scale back their parole supervision. Officials hope that would cut down on the 70% rate at which California inmates return to prison, one of the highest in the nation.


Wednesday, August 19, 2009

U.S. Life Expectancy Hits a New High of 78 - ABC News

U.S. Life Expectancy Hits a New High of 78 - ABC News
The United States has lower life expectancies overall than comparable developed countries.

Life expectancy for babies born in Japan and Singapore has reached 82. French babies will live to be 80.9 on average, while those born in Sweden, Italy, Australia and Canada can expect to live to be more than 80.

Newborn Tunisians can expect to live on average to be 75, and Guatemalans to 70. AIDS-ravaged Zimbabwe has an average life expectancy of only 39.7.


A Public Option vs. Co-ops: What's the Difference? - TIME

A Public Option vs. Co-ops: What's the Difference? - TIME
The version of the Public Plan that's often talked about is one that is tied to Medicare. [Medicare is a government-run healthcare plan for the elderly.] People who see the Public Option as hopeful believe that we need strong cost containment in the healthcare system, and that private industry will never be able to do that for a number of reasons. These people view the Public Plan as a mechanism by which we can both increase healthcare coverage to all Americans and control spending. Typically in their versions of the plan, it ties prices—doctor and hospital fees—to what Medicare pays. Also, it assumes that doctors get strong incentives, if not a mandate, to participate in the Public Plan.


Miss Universe Swimsuit Competition 2009: Who's Hottest? (PHOTOS, POLL)

Miss Universe Swimsuit Competition 2009: Who's Hottest? (PHOTOS, POLL)
Miss Universe Swimsuit Competition 2009: Who's Hottest? (PHOTOS, POLL)


2009 flu pandemic

2009 flu pandemic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The 2009 flu pandemic is a global outbreak of a new strain of a influenza A virus subtype H1N1, officially named the "new H1N1"[citation needed], first identified in April 2009, and commonly called "Swine flu." It is thought to be a reassortment of four known strains of influenza A virus[105]: one endemic in (normally infecting) humans, one endemic in birds, and two endemic in pigs (swine). Transmission of the new strain is human-to-human, with cooked pork products safe to eat as the virus cannot be transmitted by eating foods.

The outbreak began in Mexico, with evidence that Mexico was already in the midst of an epidemic for months before the outbreak was recognized. Soon after, its government closed down most of Mexico City's public and private offices and facilities to help contain the spread. In early June, as the virus spread globally, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak to be a pandemic, but also noted that most illnesses were of "moderate severity." The virus has since spread to the Southern Hemisphere which entered its winter flu season, and to many less developed countries with limited healthcare systems. Because the virus was spreading with "unprecedented speed", and many clinics were overwhelmed testing and treating patients, WHO stopped requiring countries to report all cases, but is still monitoring unusually large outbreaks.[106][107]

The virus typically spreads from coughs and sneezes or by touching contaminated surfaces and then touching the nose or mouth. Symptoms, which can last up to a week, are similar to those of seasonal flu, and may include fever, sneezes, sore throat, coughs, headache, and muscle or joint pains. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) notes that most cases worldwide are usually mild, and most hospitalizations and deaths have been of persons that also had underlying conditions such as asthma, diabetes, obesity, heart disease, or a weakened immune system. The CDC's Anne Schuchat states, "this is a virus that's capable of causing a spectrum of illness that includes severe complications and death. . . It's very important we take this virus seriously".[108] As the virus spreads easily between people, through the air or surface contact, those who get the flu are recommended to stay home from school or work and avoid crowds to avoid spreading the infection further.

In an attempt to slow the spread of the illness, a number of countries, especially in Asia, have quarantined airline passengers with flu symptoms, while some are also pre-screening passengers. WHO does not expect to have a full vaccine before the end of 2009, and vaccines available sooner may be limited and given first to healthcare workers, pregnant women, and other higher risk groups. Two or three injections will be required for maximum immunity from both the swine flu and seasonal flu. There is also concern if the new virus mutates further, it could become more virulent and less susceptible to any new vaccine.


New Deal

New Deal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The New Deal was the name that United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt gave to a complex package of economic programs he effected between 1933 and 1935 with the goals of what historians call the 3 Rs, of giving Relief to the unemployed and badly hurt farmers, Reform of business and financial practices, and promoting Recovery of the economy during the Great Depression.

When Franklin Delano Roosevelt took office on March 4, 1933, the nation was deeply troubled. Banks in 37 states were closed and many cheques could not be cashed. The unemployment rate was 25% and higher in major industrial and mining centers. Farm prices had fallen by 50%. Mortgages were being foreclosed by tens of thousands. [1] Unemployment was still high in 1939, with the normal levels reached in 1941.

Historians distinguish a "First New Deal" (1933) and a "Second New Deal" (1934-36). Some programs were declared unconstitutional, and others were repealed during World War II; in early 1937 almost no new programs were initiated because of the opposition of the new Conservative Coalition.

The "First New Deal" (March 4, 1933) was aimed at meeting the needs of practically all major groups, from banking and railroads to industry and farming. The New Deal instituted banking reform laws, work relief programs, agricultural programs, and industrial reform (the National Recovery Administration, NRA), and the end of the gold standard.[2]

A "Second New Deal" in 1934-35 included the Wagner Act to promote labor unions, the Works Progress Administration (WPA) relief program, the Social Security Act, and new programs to aid tenant farmers and migrant workers. The Supreme Court ruled several programs unconstitutional; however, most were soon replaced, with the exception of the NRA. After 1936, the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 was the only major legislation; it set maximum hours and minimum wages for most categories of workers.[3]

The WPA, CCC and other relief programs were shut down during World War II by the Conservative Coalition (i.e., the opponents of the New Deal in Congress); they argued the return of full employment made them superfluous. Many regulations were ended during the wave of deregulation from 1975 to 1989. Several New Deal programs remain active, with some still operating under the original names, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC), the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The largest programs still in existence today are the Social Security System, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and Fannie Mae.


War on Poverty

War on Poverty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The War on Poverty is the name for legislation first introduced by United States President Lyndon B. Johnson during his State of the Union address on January 8, 1964. This legislation was proposed by Johnson in response to a national poverty rate of around nineteen percent. The speech led the United States Congress to pass the Economic Opportunity Act, which established the Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO) to administer the local application of federal funds targeted against poverty.

As a part of the Great Society, Johnson's belief in expanding the government's role in social welfare programs from education to healthcare was a continuation of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal, which ran from 1933 to 1935, and the Four Freedoms of 1941.

The concept of a war on poverty waned after the 1960s. Deregulation, growing criticism of the welfare state, and an ideological shift to reducing federal aid to impoverished people in the 1980s and 1990s culminated in the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996, which, Bill Clinton claimed, "end[ed] welfare as we know it." Nonetheless, the legacy of the War on Poverty remains in the continued existence of such federal programs as Head Start and Job Corps.


Wednesday, August 12, 2009

The 2004 GSS Finding of Shrunken Social Networks: An Artifact?

ASA Journals Home | American Sociological Association


Click on The 2004 GSS Finding of Shrunken Social Networks:  An Artifact?

McPherson, Smith-Lovin, and Brashears (2006, 2008b) reported that Americans’ social
networks shrank precipitously from 1985 to 2004. When asked to list the people with
whom they discussed “important matters,” respondents to the 2004 General Social
Survey (GSS) provided about one-third fewer names than did respondents in the 1985
survey. Critically, the percentage of respondents who provided no names at all increased
from about 10 percent in 1985 to about 25 percent in 2004. The 2004 results contradict
other relevant data, however, and they contain serious anomalies; this suggests that the
apparently dramatic increase in social isolation is an artifact. One possible source of the
artifact is the section of the 2004 interview preceding the network question; it may have
been unusually taxing. Another possible source is a random technical error. With as yet
no clear account for these inconsistencies and anomalies, scholars should be cautious in
using the 2004 network data. Scholars and general readers alike should draw no
inference from the 2004 GSS as to whether Americans’ social networks changed
substantially between 1985 and 2004; they probably did not.


Deciding to Discipline: Race, Choice, and Punishment at the Frontlines of Welfare Reform

American Sociological Association | Home


Click on Deciding to Discipline: Race, Choice, and Punishment at the Frontlines of Welfare Reform

Welfare sanctions are financial penalties applied to individuals who fail to comply with
welfare program rules. Their widespread use reflects a turn toward disciplinary approaches
to poverty management. In this article, we investigate how implicit racial biases and
discrediting social markers interact to shape officials’ decisions to impose sanctions. We
present experimental evidence based on hypothetical vignettes that case managers are more
likely to recommend sanctions for Latina and black clients—but not white clients—when
discrediting markers are present. We triangulate these findings with analyses of state
administrative data. Our results for Latinas are mixed, but we find consistent evidence that
the probability of a sanction rises significantly when a discrediting marker (i.e., a prior
sanction for noncompliance) is attached to a black rather than a white welfare client.
Overall, our study clarifies how racial minorities, especially African Americans, are more
likely to be punished for deviant behavior in the new world of disciplinary welfare provision.


Toward a Unified Stratification Theory: Structure, Genome, and Status Across Human Societies

American Sociological Association | Home


Click on Toward a Unified Stratification Theory: Structure, Genome, and Status Across Human Societies

While social scientists and geneticists have a shared interest in the personal characteristics
instrumental to status attainment, little has been done to integrate these
disparate perspectives. This is unfortunate, as the perspectives offer complementary
insights, which, if properly combined, stand to substantially improve understanding
of the stratification process. This article synthesizes research from the social sciences
and genetics to develop a multistage theory of how social structure moderates
the influence of the genome on status outcomes. Its thesis is that the strength of
the genome’s influence on status is primarily moderated by two properties of social
structure—levels of resource inequality and social mobility. Thus, it is theorized
that under conditions of low inequality and high social mobility, the influence of
the genome on status will be high relative to conditions of high inequality and low
social mobility. The essential logic is (1) as inequality increases, the characteristics
and abilities intrinsically useful in status attainment are increasingly influenced by
individuals’ social backgrounds and decreasingly determined by their genomes; and
(2) as social closure and inequality increase, the utility of these characteristics and
abilities to status attainment is diminished. In sum, a model of status attainment
is developed proposing that while both genome and social background influence the
status attainment process, the relative importance of these factors is determined by
the surrounding structure of the society.


nterracial Friendships in the Transition to College: Do Birds of a Feather Flock Together Once They Leave the Nest?

American Sociological Association | Home


Click on Interracial Friendships in the Transition to College: Do Birds of a Feather Flock Together Once They Leave the Nest?

Because of segregation in neighborhoods and schools, college may provide the first opportunity
for many young adults to interact closely with members of different racial and ethnic
groups. Little research has examined how interracial friendships form during this period. This
article investigates changes in the racial composition of friendship networks in the transition
from high school to college and how aspects of the college environment are related to such
changes. Interracial friendships increase for whites, decrease for blacks, and show little change
for Latinos and Asians. The habits of friendship formation that are acquired during adolescence
and features of residential and extracurricular college contexts influence the formation of interracial
friendships. The race of one’s roommate, the degree of interracial contact in residence
halls, and participation in various types of extracurricular activities are most strongly related to
the formation of interracial friendships.


DENYING SOCIAL HARM: STUDENTS’ RESISTANCE TO LESSONS ABOUT INEQUALITY*

American Sociological Association | Home

Click on the link labeled: DENYING SOCIAL HARM: STUDENTS’ RESISTANCE
TO LESSONS ABOUT INEQUALITY*


A Century of Difference Mike Hout and Claude Fischer

A Century of Difference
Mike Hout and Claude Fischer


How Class Works in Popular Conception, February, 2007
Authors:
Michael Hout
[Download PDF]


American Households Throughout the 20th Century, revised: July, 2005
Authors:
Michael Hout and Claude S. Fischer
[Download PDF]


Different Places, Different People: The Redrawing of America's Social Geography, revised: June, 2005
Authors:
Claude S. Fischer and Michael Hout
[Download PDF]


Differences Among Americans in Living Standards Across the Twentieth Century, revised: June, 2005
Authors:
Claude S. Fischer and Michael Hout
[Download PDF]


Religious Diversity in America, 1940-2000, revised: June, 2005
Authors:
Mike Hout and Claude Fischer
[Download PDF]



MAXIMALLY MAINTAINED INEQUALITY REVISITED: IRISH EDUCATIONAL MOBILITY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

Author:
Michael Hout
(Forthcoming in CHANGING IRELAND, 1989-2003 edited by Maire NicGhiolla Phadraig and Elizabeth Hilliard. [ Download PDF]


Appendices for:
Distinguishing the Geographic Levels and Social Dimensions of U.S. Metropolitan Segregation, 1960-2000
,
Authors:
Claude S. Fischer, Gretchen Stockmayer, Jon Stiles and Michael Hout
(Text of article excluding Appendices in Demography, Feb. 2004)
[ Download PDF]


Money and Morale: What Growing Inequality is Doing to Americans' View of Themselves and Others , January, 2003
Authors:
Michael Hout
[ Download PDF]


Distinguishing the Geographic Levels and Social Dimensions of U.S. Metropolitan Segregation, 1960-2000 , August, 2003
Authors:
Claude S. Fischer, Gretchen Stockmayer, Jon Stiles and Michael Hout
[ Download PDF] Updated



Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference: Politics and Generations, April,2002
Authors:
Mike Hout and Claude Fischer
(In the American Sociological Review, Vol. 67 (April, 2002:165-190))


The Overworked American Family: Trends and Non-Trends in Working Hours, 1968-2001, June, 2002
Authors:
Mike Hout and Caroline Hanley
[Download PDF]


Tightening Up: Social Mobility in Russia, 1988-2000, June, 2002
Authors:
Ted Gerber and Mike Hout
[Download PDF]


Educational Progress for African Americans and Latinos in the United States from the 1950s to the 1990s: The Interaction of Ancestry and Class, August, 2001
Author: Mike Hout
[Download PDF]


Education: Relative and Absolute Measures, August,2001
Authors:
Jon Stiles
[Download PDF]


Time Bind and God's Time, March, 2001
Authors:
Claude Fischer, Mike Hout, Nancy Latham
[Download PDF]


Ever-More Rooted Americans, November,2000
Authors:
Claude Fischer
(Note: Shorter version of this paper published in City and Community 1 [June 2002]
[Download PDF]



Blackboard - Grades - Comb Your Hair (Boys) and Smile (Girls) - NYTimes.com

Blackboard - Grades - Comb Your Hair (Boys) and Smile (Girls) - NYTimes.com
When all three characteristics were considered together, boys experienced a statistically significant grade premium for good grooming and a penalty for being slovenly. Dr. French says he was surprised to see a “marginally significant” penalty for above-average attractiveness. For girls, pleasant personality had the most impact on grades, and to a lesser extent good grooming. Attractiveness didn’t rate.